Article 1 : Money v mosquito - Principle 6HYPERLINK hypertext transfer protocol / vane .economist .com /finance /economicsfocus /displaystory .cfm ?story_ id http /www .economist .com /finance /economicsfocus /displaystory .cfm ?story_i dThe contrive talks about a imagened subsidy for anti-malaria doses in Africa . The ongoing drug for malaria has became ineffective due to the malaria virus exploitation an license a come onst it . A newer more effective drug , map , is available but it is much more overmonetary valued than the anterior(prenominal) drug , costing between 6 to 10 in a country with an average daily wage of frail than 2 a day . Aside from the cost , at that place is in addition a sense of virus also develops an immunity to the new drug . A radical of donors and non-government organizations ar readyin g to subsidize this new drug for the bordering 5 years with the goal of flooding the marketplace with the subsidized drug which would hopefully sell at the same price as the previous cheaper drug . The rest of the article discusses the pros and cons of much(prenominal) a planThis article best reflects principle 6 as it discusses the market repercussions of such a subsidy . While a donated subsidy is an ethically good move , it may stultification the situation in the long term as it prevents the market from acting on itself . A subsidy the size that the donors argon planning would promptly grow the profits of the manufacturers of ACT do them giants in a short period . This would lead to the sultry of competition which could potentially trim back the price on its have accord many a(prenominal) other aspect to the subsidy is the fortuity of abuse . Due to the flimsy population of Africa , in some communities in that location is only a single apothecarys shop - a monop oly . People who argue against the plan say ! that in these many cases the subsidy would be extra as the owner of the pharmacy has a monopoly and allow for close likely not lower his prices even if his costs absorb dropped .
All of these cases show that arrogant prices is not as light-colored nor direct because market conditions will always intervene quite or laterArticle 2 : Who says supermarkets are dumb ? - Principle 4 HYPERLINK http /www .economist .com /blogs /freeexchange /2007 /11 /who_says_supermarke ts_are_dumb .cfm http /www .economist .com /blogs /freeexchange /2007 /11 /who_says_supermarket s_are_dumb .cfmPrinciple 4 talks about how rational populate suffice to incentive . This article talks about whole Foods attempts to gain more earnings by influencing the decision fashioning of a very specific segment of the market . The resultant role at hand is the recent move by an number of Whole Foods Supermarket located near the city center of cap DC . This branch of Whole Foods recently allowed parking confirmation for their automobilist customers . This begs the question of if they do this , why don t they offer deportation vouchers for their customers who use public transportation . Additionally , there is also the question of the significance of the parking validation curiously since the primordial clientele of Whole Foods can be considered upscale...If you require to tucker a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment